Archive for December, 2009
Scapegoats: Stop Telling the Truth
You can read the entire series at Scapegoat Role.
(I always advocate strongly for individuals to think for themselves and make their own assessments of who they are and what they need. If this topic makes sense to you, take it and use it for all it is worth. If you feel this doesn’t apply to you, it doesn’t. Trust that and move on.)
To stop yourself from replicating the role you have to realize some of the behaviors you employ to cast yourself as the scapegoat. One behavior might be the tendency to be “the truth teller”. Scapegoats are often the truth tellers in their families of origin. They say what cannot be said by anyone else. They are the ones who bring the skeletons out of the closet and throw them into the middle of the living room to be confronted. Dad is abusive. Mom is an alcoholic. Whatever the family dysfunction is, they name it and want the family to claim it. But that is not what happens.
A dysfunctional, scapegoating family, confronted with their own transgressions will often redirect all energy toward targeting the scapegoat rather than own their own behavior. You may not be able to stop your family from scapegoating you, but you can definitely stop yourself from being put in that role in your adult relationships. If you are scapegoated because you tell the truth, look at that behavior. It is important for scapegoats to take control of their truth telling in two different ways:
1) Only tell your own truths
Do not speak up for other people. Be clear whose emotions you are expressing. Often, in a relationship system, whether it is a family, an office or a group of friends, other people will come to the scapegoat to express their distress about a situation. They subconsciously try to lure the scapegoat into picking up his sword and shield and fighting their battle for them. This is often done as “let’s go say something to the boss about this” or “we need to talk to Mom about her drinking”. Ahem. You know this game. Somehow “we” becomes “you”. You go talk to Mom. If you tell Mom that the family is upset about her drinking and she goes to the others and asks them about it, they often will claim they have no idea what she is talking about. Now you and Mom are fighting about how you feel about her drinking. And the person who is really worried about her drinking is nowhere in the room.
It’s important that you stop fighting battles for other people. If someone is talking to you about a situation that is upsetting (they won’t say upsetting them, it’s just universally upsetting) and they are asking you to join them in confronting the situation, stop. Step back. Breathe. Check yourself. How did you feel about the situation before the person started talking to you? If you were O.K. with it, then it was O.K. with you. You are not upset about it. They are. Get your original emotions back and back away from the other person’s emotions. Hand them back to the person who brought them to you. You can verbally do this by saying something like, “If this is really upsetting you so much, why don’t you talk to Mom about it yourself?” Eliminate the triangle of them, you and Mom. Direct it back to one to one communication: you (the person who has the emotions) talk to Mom (the person with whom they are upset).
2) Choose the truths you tell
What happens when you are the one who is upset? Must you always speak every truth that exists?
Scapegoats often have the belief that it is their job to tell the truth, every truth, every time. And they are right. It is their job. But I thought you wanted to resign from this job. If you want to resign as scapegoat you will have to resign your job duties. World Truth Teller will have to go. Hanging onto the belief that it is your duty to tell all truths you see leaves you powerless and at the mercy of everyone else who does not feel this need. Other people who don’t feel the need to speak every truth have a much more peaceful and pleasant life.
I am not advocating that you scapegoat someone else. I’m not suggesting that you take your emotions and put them on some other scapegoat to speak for you. No, no, no. I’m simply suggesting that you make choices about which truths you speak.
Example:
Let’s say you work with someone who is coming to work drunk everyday. Ask yourself some questions:
1. Is it hurting you?
2. Is their drunkenness endangering anyone? (Are they an airline pilot or a bookkeeper?)
3. Are they riding the bus and not driving to work?
4. What would be the purpose of pointing out the drunkenness?
5. How would you go about telling this truth?
Questions 1-3 are about the need for speaking this truth. Is it really a concern or just a character flaw? We all have them. Perhaps it’s best to let this person have theirs.
Question 4 is a big one. If you just want to feel self righteous or “right” you may be truth telling as a way of scapegoating someone else. This is your family pattern so it is important to be aware of it. You certainly wouldn’t want to turn it on anyone else. Pointing out someone else’s flaws is a way of making yourself look better, at least that’s the idea. If you do it excessively you might look more like a complainer, a snitch or a poor team player. Examine your motives carefully. It is better to save your truth telling for things that really matter to you. If you are constantly complaining, people stop listening. If you always go along when things don’t really matter to you, when you do have a problem people will be more receptive.
Question 5 also examines motivation. Do you want to quietly let the person know that you can smell alcohol on them? (I almost typed “everyone”! See how hard these patterns are to break??? Beware of bringing truths from “everyone”. They are almost always from “everyone” except you!) If the person has asked you about this, it might be appropriate. If it is putting their job at risk, it might be appropriate. But if you just want to let them know that you know, perhaps you are just on your high horse and wanting to feel superior. If you want to tell their supervisor about it, check yourself twice. This is where most scapegoating patterns lead. Many scapegoats have a tendency to be perfectionistic and hypercritical. Take this into account before telling any “truths”.
Dueling Divorcees and Christmas Cheer
The way some parents deal with divorce and their children is very upsetting. There often seems to be no concern for the child, only getting the best of the other parent. And the legal system often seems to perpetuate it. In the few cases in which I have been involved there are only cursory references to what is best for the child. The majority of the conversation seems to revolve around the “rights” of the parents.
A lawyer once told me, even in cases where a parent has sexually assaulted a child it is very rare for their parental rights to be terminated. The court will almost always maintain that they have a right to have a relationship with the child, even if only in supervised visits. Excuse me? If you molest your child I believe you have forfeited your “rights”.
If a child has been abused by one parent it is up to the other parent to protect them, and rightfully so. However, the overburdened Child Protective Services system often fails to protect the child. The burden then lies solely on the protective parent to financially pay for a lawyer to protect the child from the other parent. This can cost tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars depending on how much the abusive parent can put toward contesting the petition. And if the non-abusive parent does not have this kind of money? The abusive parent retains their “rights”. Why is it that only the children of wealthy parents can be protected? Aren’t all of our children important?
I have a colleague who maintains that parents should not have rights. Children should have rights. Parents should have privileges. And those privileges can be revoked if they are detrimental to the well-being of the child. If someone out there is looking for a good cause this would be it. Children need an advocate in the court speaking for them. The laws in this country need to be amended to put the burden on protecting the best interests of the child, not the parents.
To the New Decade
Cuz we’re all sick of the last one.
FD likes to go over the events of the year in December, has been obsessing about this for about a week. Between the two of us, without a blog to record them (for this is not that kind of blog), we try to remember what has happened to us and to the people we know. It’s a long list of remembers.
I’ve just come from my mother’s house, refreshed from a nap on her sofa. The day has started, as usual, at nine in the office, but I cut my afternoon hours to go to the funeral of a close friend, an expected passing. In our community it is tradition, following the service, to follow the mais, the dead person, to the grave, literally walk behind the casket. These days bodies are flown to different destinations, different cities, even countries. So we walk behind the hearse in the cold, the rain, whatever the weather, to say goodbye.
Our friend wasn’t a rabbi, he was just a regular guy, but special of course, to us.
The rabbis of two synagogues eulogized David, spoke of his faith and acceptance of disease, this gorgeous, positive man, his sweet-disposition, how he and his family moved to Chicago thirteen years ago. He helped build two synagogues, two renovations of older buildings, one edifice now more beautiful than the next.
The rabbis of each shul claim him. It wasn’t with money, although I could be wrong, but surely with time, that he gave of himself. Everything takes time, all worthy projects. They speak of him in one of the new synagogues, and after the speeches, we follow our friend, on foot, to the next.
It’s really cold, and me being a cold kind of person anyway, cold-intolerant, wearing a short, fall jacket, could easily opt out of the march down the busy street, but it doesn’t feel like an option. Maybe reading the stories from the Holocaust, the survivor tales, has changed me. I make an association, cold is an obstacle, nothing more or less, and of course, this isn’t Poland, dead of winter, 1942. And that awful awareness of the elements and the coldness of death, too, disappear.
I meet up with FD at the destination, and he greets me with, “I felt I had to walk, even though it’s really cold; that it was an honor to accompany him.” Right there with you, dear.
We walk together to the car in no particular hurry and he continues, “Let’s stay together the whole day. I won’t go back to the office. I’ll go with you, wherever you’re going.” He knows that I’m picking up my mother, taking her to visit my father in the hospital, but there are errands, things to do. The day is full like every other day.
“Sometimes,” he says, as we buckle ourselves in, “I think you don’t need this kind of thing as much as me, just being together, that I’m not so necessary.”
Such bait. I reassure, explain that this isn’t so, and why. You might call this emotional intimacy.
We swing over to the grocery store to pick up an anniversary cake for my parents. I blank on the year, how long they’re married, but have the number 64 in my head (wrong), so I tell the woman behind the counter, “Just write on the cake . . .”
Mom & Dad, 64?
FD picks up champagne and sparkling grape juice, not sure if they’ll let my father have a little champagne or not, and flowers, tulips. I pick out some cards, one from us, one from my mother to my father, forgetting to buy one from my father to my mother. Neither of them is in a position to buy the other anything.

We pick up Mom at her house. She’s waiting at the front door. She doesn’t know we’re going to have a little party in the hospital room to celebrate her anniversary. FD and I are very excited.
Dad is sitting up in a chair, dressed. His hair is getting kind of long, in the hospital eight days. He’s happy for the company but short of breath, six words to a breath, at most, sounds a little like the Godfather. He suggests, as we begin to sign the cards in front of him, that we get some post-its, write on these so we can recycle the cards.
You see, everyone’s green these days.
But the cards are good, spot on, and we save them, so we sign them and hand them over. We don’t stay long because he has work to do, it is time for rehab and if he isn’t rehabbed, then what is he doing here, anyway? We want to keep him out of the hospital, but we’re in no hurry. Every new decision is stressful. It’s hard on my mother to shlep here every day. And she’s lonely living without him, vulnerable, too.
It isn’t easy staying awake on the drive back to the house, but I can’t say this, of course. I flop on her sofa, asleep before I’ve even closed my eyes. While I nap she brushes off an old winter dress coat of hers because I’ve complained about being cold in my jacket, and haven’t bought a new coat for myself in twenty years.
I wake up in a start and eventually ask FD. “What must it be like for her to see me age like this, crash on her couch like I just did? I was out for an hour!”
“We see our kids getting older,” he philosophizes.
Not the same. Anyway. We start recollecting, without a blog, the year.
There have been other friends who are now gone, young people, at least we think so, one who left us at 50, suffering in silence, telling no one about her disease. A teacher. We call teachers in our community, stars. These are our stars. We lost a star.
Only about five weeks ago we lost another dear friend to a heart attack, 62. Playing raquetball. We escorted his body to the cargo hangar at the airport; he had a ticket to Israel for burial in the holy land. His mother, already there, reportedly said,
“I can accept it. I just can’t believe it.”
The week after that we heard that yet another member of the community had passed away in Spain, and the Spanish authorities want to embalm the body, not a Jewish tradition, unless the community, the family, comes up with $70,000 for transport on a private jet. Somehow this money is found. But an important person talks to another important person and the commercial airliner takes the body, as is.
And so it goes. Two of my uncles leave us, one younger than my father, one older.
People lose jobs, people lose lives, and we understand that 25% of all Americans are in danger of losing their homes. We watch, experience these statistics like everyone else, and worry.
Meanwhile, (K”H*) my brother-in-law has a new lease on life, a new kidney, not an easy find in your sixties, and my father, although gasping for breath, has a fistula and with the help of dialysis, could live for many more years. My grandson, an infant, has a heart that is whole. The surgeon who sewed it up is a doctor without borders who does this surgery on 13 year olds in impoverished villages, children who have not, until their surgery, lived a not-blue day in their lives.
We’ve had many new babies in the family, and marriages.
We have this idea, in my culture, that it’s all decided, everything that happens to everyone in the world is decided on the Jewish New Year, a holiday that rolls around in September or October, depending upon the lunar cycle. We take off time for the holidays, look deeply into ourselves, our behavior, the things we’ve done, that which we haven’t done, and we apologize, mainly to one another, for our greatest deficits, which we feel are communal, social. Then, ten days later, we fast for twenty-five hours, face our King, own up to our garbage, vow to do better, and hope for the best.
But since everyone else reviews their year at the end of December, some of us do this, too. We look back to look forward, as the snow falls and the temperatures drop into the single digits.
And it’s New Years.
To you and yours, may it be happy, healthy, safe, and full of love,
therapydoc
*K”H means, basically, the evil eye should leave you alone.
To the New Decade
Cuz we’re all sick of the last one.
FD likes to go over the events of the year in December, has been obsessing about this for about a week. Between the two of us, without a blog to record them (for this is not that kind of blog), we try to remember what has happened to us and to the people we know. It’s a long list of remembers.
I’ve just come from my mother’s house, refreshed from a nap on her sofa. The day has started, as usual, at nine in the office, but I cut my afternoon hours to go to the funeral of a close friend, an expected passing. In our community it is tradition, following the service, to follow the mais, the dead person, to the grave, literally walk behind the casket. These days bodies are flown to different destinations, different cities, even countries. So we walk behind the hearse in the cold, the rain, whatever the weather, to say goodbye.
Our friend wasn’t a rabbi, he was just a regular guy, but special of course, to us.
The rabbis of two synagogues eulogized David, spoke of his faith and acceptance of disease, this gorgeous, positive man, his sweet-disposition, how he and his family moved to Chicago thirteen years ago. He helped build two synagogues, two renovations of older buildings, one edifice more beautiful than the next.
The rabbis of each shul claim him. It wasn’t with money, although I could be wrong, maybe am, but surely with time, that he gave of himself. Everything takes time, all worthy projects. They speak of him in one of the new edifices, and after the speeches, we follow our friend, on foot, to the next.
It’s really cold, and me being a cold kind of person anyway, cold-intolerant, wearing a short, fall jacket, could easily opt out of the march down the busy street, but it doesn’t feel like an option. Maybe reading the stories from the Holocaust, the survivor tales, has changed me. I make an association, cold is an obstacle, nothing more or less, and of course, this isn’t Poland, dead of winter, 1942. And that awful awareness of the elements and the coldness of death, too, disappear.
I meet up with FD at the destination, and he greets me with, “I felt I had to walk, even though it’s really cold; that it was an honor to accompany him.” Right there with you, dear.
We walk together to the car in no particular hurry and he continues, “Let’s stay together the whole day. I won’t go back to the office. I’ll go with you, wherever you’re going.”
“Sometimes,” he goes on, as we buckle ourselves in, “I think you don’t need this kind of thing as much as me, just being together, that I’m not so necessary.”
Such bait. I reassure, explain that this isn’t so, and why. You might call this emotional intimacy.
We swing over to the grocery store to pick up an anniversary cake for my parents. I blank on the year, how long they’re married, but have the number 64 in my head (wrong), so I tell the woman behind the counter, just write
Mom & Dad, 64?
FD picks up champagne and sparkling grape juice, not sure if they’ll let my father have a little champagne or not, and flowers. Tulips. I pick out some cards, one from us, one from my mother to my father, forgetting to buy one from my father to my mother. Neither of them is in a position to buy the other anything.

We pick up Mom at her house. She’s waiting at the front door. She doesn’t know we’re going to have a little party in the hospital room to celebrate her anniversary. FD and I are very excited.
Dad is sitting up in a chair, dressed. His hair is getting kind of long, in the hospital eight days. He’s happy for the company but short of breath, six words to a breath, at most. A little like the Godfather. He suggests, as we begin to sign the cards in front of him, that we get some post-its, write on these so we can recycle the cards.
You see, everyone’s green these days.
But the cards are good, spot on, and we save them, so we sign them and hand them over. We don’t stay long because he has work to do, it is time for rehab and if he isn’t rehabbed, then what is he doing here, anyway? We want to keep him out of the hospital, but we’re in no hurry. Every new decision is stressful. It’s hard on my mother to shlep here every day. And she’s lonely living without him, vulnerable, too.
It isn’t easy staying awake on the drive back to the house, but I can’t say this, of course. I flop on her sofa, asleep before I’ve even closed my eyes. While I nap she brushes off an old winter dress coat of hers because I’ve complained about being cold in my jacket, and haven’t bought a new coat for myself in twenty years.
I wake up in a start and eventually ask FD. “What must it be like for her to see me age like this, crash on her couch like I just did? I was out for an hour!”
“We see our kids getting older,” he philosophizes.
Not the same. Anyway. We start recollecting, without a blog, the year.
There have been other friends who are now gone, young people, at least we think so, one who left us at 50, suffering in silence, telling no one about her disease. A teacher. We call teachers in our community, stars. These are our stars. We lost a star.
Only about five weeks ago we lost another dear friend to a heart attack, 62. Playing raquetball. We escorted his body to the cargo hangar at the airport; he had a ticket to Israel for burial in the holy land. His mother, already there, reportedly said, “I can accept it. I just can’t believe it.”
The week after that we heard that yet another member of the community had passed away in Spain, and the Spanish authorities want to embalm the body, not a Jewish tradition, unless the community, the family, comes up with $70,000 for transport on a private jet. Somehow this money is found. But an important person talks to another important person and the commercial airliner takes the body, as is.
And so it goes. Two of my uncles leave us, one younger than my father, one older.
People lose jobs, people lose lives, and we understand that 25% of all Americans are in danger of losing their homes. We watch, experience these statistics like everyone else, and worry.
Meanwhile, (K”H*) my brother-in-law has a new lease on life, a new kidney, not an easy find in your sixties, and my father, although gasping for breath, has a fistula and with the help of dialysis, could live for many more years. My grandson, an infant, has a heart that is whole. The surgeon who sewed it up is a doctor without borders who does this surgery on 13 year olds in impoverished villages, children who have not, until their surgery, lived a not-blue day in their lives.
We’ve had many new babies in the family, and marriages.
We have this idea, in my culture, that it’s all decided, everything that happens to everyone in the world is decided on the Jewish New Year, a holiday that rolls around in September or October, depending upon the lunar cycle. We take off time for the holidays, look deeply into ourselves, our behavior, the things we’ve done, that which we haven’t done, and we apologize, mainly to one another, for our greatest deficits, which we feel are communal, social. Then, ten days later, we fast for twenty-five hours, face our King, own up to our garbage, vow to do better, and hope for the best.
But since everyone else reviews their year at the end of December, some of us do this, too. We look back to look forward, as the snow falls and the temperatures drop into the single digits.
And it’s New Years.
To you and yours, may it be happy, healthy, safe, and full of love,
therapydoc
*K”H means, basically, the evil eye should leave you alone.
Winter Fundraiser, Close But Stalled
I didn’t expect the fundraiser to generate much action after the 22nd and I was right since nothing has come in since. As things stand now, the total raised to date is $3,695.26 from 81 people. Thanks to all who’ve contributed so far. There’s a mere $304.74 to go to hit the overall goal of $4,000 and it’d be swell if that remainder was wiped before year end. On Tuesday (or late Monday), I will have a major post up that I’ve been working on over the holiday weekend that will reinforce for those of you who contribute why you support this site and will hopefully establish for those of you who haven’t why you should. You’ll see what I mean on Tuesday.
As usual, the PayPal button is on the right. If you prefer using snail mail, send me an email and I’ll send you my mailing address.
Thanks in advance for your support.
Senate Health Care Reform Bill Contains Controversial MOTHERS Act, Abortion Study
Over the weekend I finally got time to roll through the recently-passed Senate health care reform bill and, like its House cousin, it contains much of the language of the controversial MOTHERS Act. You can download the Senate bill here and start reading at page 595.
As I noted in October when the House Democrats rolled out their version of health care reform, let me just carefully point out that it confuses me that legislation that is supposed to gain uninsured Americans access to health care (out of their own pockets in many cases) contains an Act that is little more than a postpartum depression screening program and public health awareness raising nation-wide education campaign. That helps uninsured Americans gain access to health insurance how? It makes me wonder what Senate (and House) members pushed for its inclusion and on what basis. I know the Act has been knocking around Congress for much of the past decade and could never gain passage, so I guess this was the most efficacious manner for its backers to get it through.
The MOTHERS Act itself has been the object of much criticism–by women even and a psychiatrist–as a disease mongering gift to pharma companies. Feel free to draw your own conclusions. I’ve learned from bitter experience that it’s probably not very wise for me to have an opinion about the Act itself.
The Senate bill also contains language supporting basic research of the causes of PPD, epidemiological studies of its frequency, “the development of improved screening and diagnostic techniques” and “clinical research for the development
and evaluation of new treatments.”
One wonders what new treatments those might be–isn’t Paxil in pregnant women working out just fine so far for mother and child? Is there some new drug on the horizon specifically tailored to PPD? Is there some new psychotherapy on the horizon? Or are they just going to hand out money so that some researchers can pretend that there might be when, in fact, we’re probably stuck with the pills and therapies we already have? And all of this affects Americans access to affordable health care how?
Inserted into the language on PPD research and education, the bill contains language similar to the House bill (which I wrote about here) on researching the mental health outcomes of women who have abortions or otherwise resolve a pregnancy. To whit:
“It is the sense of Congress that the Director of the National
Institute of Mental Health may conduct a nationally representative longitudinal study (during the period of fiscal years 2010 through 2019) of the relative mental health consequences for women of resolving a pregnancy (intended and unintended) in various ways, including carrying the pregnancy to term and
parenting the child, carrying the pregnancy to term and placing the child for adoption, miscarriage, and having an abortion. This study may assess the incidence, timing, magnitude, and duration of the immediate and long-term
mental health consequences (positive or negative) of these pregnancy outcomes.
As I wondered aloud in October, it’s not clear to me how such a study would affect Americans access to health insurance, but perhaps I am a blockhead. I also wonder who pressed to have this provision stuck into the bill since it’s not clear to me whether such a study would serve the interests of pro-lifers or pro-choicers.
If anyone knows, feel free to enlighten me.
Adult ADHD And Sleep Problems
A study by Harvard’s Joseph Biederman and others at Harvard/MGH in the November Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, which just went online, and reached one of the least controversial findings of the controversial psychiatrist’s career: adults with ADHD (and that’s the term researchers used instead of ADD) have more difficulty with sleep than do people without ADHD.
“Results: Adults with ADHD went to bed later than control subjects and had a wider range of bedtimes (mean ± SD = 18 ± 92 min vs 54 ± 69 min before midnight; P < .001), were more likely to take over an hour to fall asleep (OR = 5.22, P = .001), and were more likely (P < .003) to experience difficulty going to bed, going to sleep, sleeping restfully, or waking in the morning. Adults with ADHD experienced daytime sleepiness more often (OR = 2.23, P = .003) and reported more sleep problems (mean ± SD = 6.7 ± 2.5 vs 4.3 ± 2.2; P < .001) than controls. All sleep impairments were significantly associated with ADHD independent of contributions to sleep disruption from ADHD pharmacotherapy, comorbidities likely to contribute to sleep disturbance, and age at ADHD onset.
“Conclusion: Sleep disturbances that are not attributable to comorbid mental health conditions or ADHD pharmacotherapy are associated with ADHD in adulthood. Clinicians and researchers should consider the potential contribution of sleep disruption to the clinical presentation of adults with ADHD.”
While I don’t necessarily buy researchers’ implied argument that going to sleep before midnight is the gold standard of sleep (especially if someone works swing or graveyard shifts. Do Biederman et al. really believe that everyone works 8 to 5 and that that’s the appropriate standard for poking into sleep and ADHD? Ah, ivory towers and pharma dough!), I have no problem with the idea that sleep difficulties could be tangled up with adult ADHD (A dx I’m somewhat dubious of, but I’ll leave that be for now). The fact is sleep problems are entwined with several mental disorders, depression and bipolar disorder most prominently.
I’m not quite comfortable with the researchers’ assertion that the sleep problems can be determined to be independent of ADHD meds or a history of taking ADHD meds and other psychotropics. I mean, maybe they can get there statistically. But over the years of doing this site and hearing from readers and from just your basic workaday observations of people with depression, bipolar disorder and ADHD, I’ve come to the conclusion that psych meds are almost always at least partially implicated in sleep problems (both in sleeping too little and in sleeping too much and in general difficulties falling asleep). In the years since I became meds-free (and it’s nice to be able to say “years” in that regard), sleep has come more easily and been of better quality. Of course, if the Biederman crew took a look at what time I go to sleep most nights (2 a.m.), they’d be screaming “ADHD” at me. But I’ve been a late-night type since my college days. I had little choice since I was taking a full load, working five hours a day and studying six hours a night along with getting up at 6 a.m. to run three miles and go lift weights before breakfast. ADHD had nothing to do with that pattern establishing itself.
The other thing I’ve picked up on over the years from reader emails and the real world is that far too often people with depression, bipolar disorder and whatnot spend way, way too much time on their computers late into the evening. Computers and the ‘Net have become such deeply distracting, “You must multi-task on me or leave society” devices that I wouldn’t be shocked at all if they are as much at the heart of adult ADHD problems as are sleep problems and ADHD itself.
I know a psychologist in Seattle who’s been working with kids and teens and ADHD and conduct disorders and such for 30 years. I ran into her at a party perhaps a year ago and amidst telling me that she thought the entire bipolar child paradigm was BS, she said that when a new teen client came in with his or her parents she told them that if they didn’t agree to limit computer/call phone use at home to one hour a day, then she wouldn’t work with them. She couldn’t control how much a kid was forced to use a computer at school, but getting them to back off the many hours a day kids spent using computers (and MySpace and IMs and text messages) each day in almost every case went a long way to resolving the kids’ problems. They were less distracted and slept better. Or so she told me.
I wonder if the Biederman crew made any attempt to account for computer/Internet use confounds in its study. As far as I can tell, they didn’t.
Vic Chesnutt Dead At 45, Possible Suicide
t’s with a lot of sadness that I pass along news that the great singer-songwriter Vic Chesnutt died yesterday, aged 45. He’d been in a coma and some reports indicate that was as the result of a suicide attempt. A paraplegic since a car accident in his teen years, Chesnutt was reportedly facing $70,000 in medical bills due to recent surgery and was unable to pay. I have no idea if that fed into his possible suicide attempt.
I once saw Chesnutt play a show in San Diego back in 1992 or so. I bought a cassette tape of his wonderful album “West of Rome” off him at the show and chatted with him for a bit. Nice guy. It sucks that he’s gone. RIP.
Merry Christmas, Happy Hannukkah And So On
I hope you all are having a nice, peaceful holiday regardless of what you celebrate. My flight down from Seattle to Tucson yesterday was a complete pain in the butt–what has happened to air travel?–and I’d just like to say that US Airways stinks. But I’m enjoying the nice weather in Tucson–low 50s, sunny and two more hours of daylight a day than in Seattle this time of year. I need it.
I’ll be back to regular posting on Monday.
Oh, yes, the Senate Dems passed their health care reform bill earlier today. I don’t have much to say about it right now since the real action will come after the New Year when it has to be reconciled with the House version of the bill. That said, I’m sure you are all aware that the Senate bill is drawing heaps of criticism from both the political left and right. One writer at Firedoglake.com, about as lefty a joint as you’ll find on the ‘Net, described the whole business as “Obama’s Health Care Cult of Personality” and offered a fairly decent critique of the bill. In less than one year, the President’s most ardent supporters have turned into some of his biggest foes. Not sure if I saw that coming. I’m sure you can imagine what conservatives are saying about the bill.
Anyway, I hope the year winds down peacefully for you all.
Words
I’m often puzzled by the way people think about words; which words offend them and which ones they think nothing of using.
The obvious example is the “f” word. So many people are highly offended by this, even when it is used to benignly express exasperation or frustration and is not aimed at a human being (i.e.”This is f*ed up!”) These are not words of hate or aggression. They are someone expressing how they feel. Granted, they are expressing it in very strong terms, but these words are not aimed at anyone. This is vastly different from someone who is using words to harm.
What amazes me is when people who are so easily offended by the “f” word think nothing of using words which are directed at people in a harmful way. These same people are not “offended” by words like; stupid, dummy, fatso, loser, retard, idiot, weirdo, geek, sissy, freak, bimbo, fugly, slow poke, silly, etc. I hear parents lamblasting their children with these words everyday. I hear couples yelling these words at each other. I hear families using these words for each other. I think of Michael Jackson’s self mutilation through plastic surgery because of constantly being called “big nose” by his brothers.
There is a concept in psychology called “self-fulfilling prophecy”. If you tell someone their entire life that they will be a loser, they will often grow up to be a loser. The insult becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, especially if it is aimed at a child.
Abuse of any kind should not be tolerated, but in some ways I think that mental and verbal abuse has an insidious quality that physical abuse does not. Broken bones and bruises are easily recognized at being abuse. But a constant mental barrage of demeaning words is not so easy to see. And when we deem these words to be “harmless” or “inoffensive” we may not even realize that we are being abused.